Fitzgerald's success in identifying the government sources of information in his investigation ensures that reporters and their confidential sources will be fair game for some time. I'm looking for a third reason why should reporters not required to reveal their sources my first and second reason are indemnifies their sources, to encourage people to give important information to the public. Should newspapers be expected to reveal their sources 1 following 10 but if you are thinking to make it mandatory to disclose all the sources there could be issues already we have seen the sensational news causing controversy or the controversy becoming the sensational itemthe news reporter or the news channels legs. Toronto — the international federation of journalists today called upon the south african authorities to withdraw subpoenas issued to journalists, which could force them to reveal their sources. I think that sometimes newspaper reporters should have to reveal there sources but than again if they did people would tell them there story or the dirty details because they don't want others knowing it is them talking telling the reporters and they don't want the world to know they are snitches than we wont have an reports in the news or magazines.
A reporter/journalist can protect and keep confidential a confidential source unless the government can prove:1) that there is probable cause to believe the reporter has info that is relevant to a specific violation of the law. Should newspaper reporters be required to reveal sources/ english choose one of the topics given, write an argumentative thesis, and support the thesis in a four- to six-paragraph argumentative essay. Recognise the value to the public interest of source protection, with its legal foundation in the right to freedom of expression (including press freedom), and to privacy.
Gregg leslie, the legal defense director for the reporters committee for freedom of the press, told the times he viewed the verdict as “disappointing,” and even suggested it was a step-backwards only so few days after holder’s alleged effort to ensure the privacy of sources and reporters. Should newspaper reporters be required to reveal their sources i believe they should tell the source of thier information other wise they will just make a bunch of stuff up to get popular and get the money from newspaper reporters. In journalism, a source is a person, publication, or other record or document that gives timely informationoutside journalism, sources are sometimes known as news sources examples of sources include official records, publications or broadcasts, officials in government or business, organizations or corporations, witnesses of crime, accidents or other events, and people involved with or.
Should journalists bylaw be forced to reveal their sources the topic of journalists being forced bylaw to reveal their sources has been widely discussed it is a very tough topic as there are many positive arguments for both sides first of all without sources there would be nothing to write about, therefore sources are very essential. A: the world of journalism has undergone a mass transformation citizens increasingly receive their news from online sources while newspaper circulation and television broadcast viewing has declined, but the laws governing the news media have changed little. Should newspaper reporters be required to reveal their sources for the past few decades, reporters have been battling with government officials and corporations to keep their sources confidential journalists continue to face the pressure of revealing their sources. There is no reason reporters should be forced to reveal their sources the beautiful part about reporting is the fact that reporters have to seek out the truth a reporter, most typically, finds that truth by talking to major players behind closed doors. No, journalists should not be forced to reveal their sources that would be the end of the freedom of the press as we in the uk have seen recently, this freedom is already under threat from another source the ability of media magnates to buy favours and friendship from political parties.
Should a journalist be punished for revealing a murderer’s secrets jana winter, a reporter at fox news, covered the shooting rampage that killed 12 people and injured 58 others at a movie. A source always has the option, if they're really, really concerned, to give the information anonymously, to provide information to a reporter without identifying themselves -- slip the documents. Hayes, rejecting by a 5-4 vote claims by newspaper reporters in kentucky, new york and rhode island for a constitutional “privilege” not to be forced to disclose the identity of news sources to grand juries investigating crimes involving drugs and the activities of militant groups.
The ability to report the news often depends on the ability to protect the confidentiality of news sourceswhen a journalist faces a defamation suit based on information provided by a confidential source, however, the promise of anonymity to that person may prevent the reporter from relying on certain defenses. The protection of sources, sometimes also referred to as the confidentiality of sources or in the us as the reporter's privilege, is a right accorded to journalists under the laws of many countries, as well as under international law it prohibits authorities, including the courts, from compelling a journalist to reveal the identity of an. Reporters should be forced to reveal their sources it is important to know where the evidence that we get comes from if we don't know who the source is then how do we know that the news is real, it could just be fake news. Journalists argue that being forced to reveal confidential sources and to disclose confidential information infringes on the newsgathering process and erodes the independence of the news media from the government.